Citation-
http://en.oreilly.com/oscon2009/public/schedule/detail/10432
StackOverflow Flash Mob for the R User Community
Moderated by: Michael E. Driscoll
7:00pm Wednesday, 07/22/2009
Location: Ballroom A2In concert with users online across the country, this session will lead a flashmob to populate StackOverflow with R language content.
R, the open source statistical language, has a notoriously steep learning curve. The same technical questions tend be asked repeatedly on the R-help mailing lists, to the detriment of both R experts (who tire of repeating themselves) and the learners (who often receive a technically correct, but terse response).
We have developed a list of the most common 100 technical R questions, based on an analysis of (i) queries sent to the RSeek.org web portal, and (ii) an examination of the R-help list archives, and (iii) a survey of members of R Users Groups in San Francisco, LA, and New York City.
In the first hour, participants will pair up to claim a question, formulate it on StackOverflow, and provide a comprehensive answer. In the second hour, participants will rate, review, and comment on the set of submitted questions and answers.
While Stackoverflow currently lacks content for the R language, we believe this effort will provide the spark to attract more R users, and emerge as a valuable resource to the growing R community.
This is an interesting example of a statistical software community using twitter for a tech help event. I hope this trend/ event gets replicated again and again-
Statisticians worldwide unite in the language of maths !!!
Please follow @rstatsmob to participate. See you at 7 PM PST!



Figure 1 provides performance comparisons between original R functions assuming a four thread data parallel solution on Intel Core i7 920 and our GPU enabled R functions for a GTX 295 GPU. The speedup test consisted of testing each of three algorithms with five randomly generated data sets. The Granger causality algorithm was tested with a lag of 2 for 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 random variables with 10 observations each. Complete hierarchical clustering was tested with 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 points. Calculation of Kendall’s correlation coefficient was tested with 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 random variables with 10000 observations each